How climate change is mobilizing plastic pollution

The case against plastic pollution just got sharper. A new review argues that global warming is turning plastics into more mobile, persistent, and hazardous pollutants.

This happens as plastics break down into tiny fragments, which helps those fragments travel farther and intensifies the harm they cause once they arrive.

The authors, led by researchers at Imperial College London (ICL), warn that without swift action to curb the flow of plastics into the environment, we risk crossing into irreversible ecological damage.

“Plastic pollution and the climate are co-crises that intensify each other. They also have origins – and solutions – in common,” said lead author Frank Kelly.

“We urgently need a coordinated international approach to stop end-of-life plastics from building up in the environment.”

Climate stress speeds plastic breakdown

The review pulls together evidence showing how climate stressors compound plastic impacts. Hotter temperatures, higher humidity, and stronger ultraviolet radiation speed the fragmentation of larger items into microplastics.

At the same time, extreme storms and floods grind debris into even smaller pieces and sling it across watersheds and coastlines.

Global plastic production has surged 200-fold since 1950, and the problem will only grow as manufacturing expands and climate pressures increase.

The consequences ripple through ecosystems. In fresh and marine waters, microplastics can disrupt nutrient cycling and food webs. On land, they degrade soil structure and reduce crop yields.

At high enough levels, they alter feeding, reproduction, and behavior across a wide range of organisms.

The particles also act like “Trojan horses,” picking up and ferrying other contaminants, such as heavy metals, pesticides, and PFAS, while leaching their own additives such as flame retardants and plasticizers.

Microplastics released from melting ice

The team flags a looming feedback from the cryosphere. As sea ice forms, it traps and concentrates microplastics, temporarily clearing them from the water column.

But as the Arctic warms and seasonal ice retreats, those long-stored particles are poised to flush back into the ocean. That delayed pulse could add to the background load already surging from rivers and coastlines.

“There’s a chance that microplastics – already in every corner of the planet – will have a greater impact on certain species over time,” said study co-author Stephanie Wright from ICL.

“Both the climate crisis and plastic pollution, which come from society’s over-reliance on fossil fuels, could combine to worsen an already stressed environment in the near future.”

Predators face rising plastic danger

In the sea, the double hit of warming and plastic is especially stark. Laboratory and field studies show that corals, snails, urchins, mussels, and fish all struggle more under heat and acidification when microplastics are present.

Filter feeders can concentrate particles and pass them up the food chain. In one example cited by the authors, microplastic-linked mortality in fish quadrupled with warmer water. In another, worsening hypoxia – itself driven by warming – pushed cod to ingest more plastic.

Apex species may be at particular risk. Long-lived top predators like killer whales accumulate exposures over decades, stacking microplastics and attached chemicals on top of other stressors such as noise, prey shortages, and contaminants.

“Apex predators such as orcas could be the canaries in the coal mine, as they may be especially vulnerable to the combined impact of climate change and plastic pollution,” said study co-author Guy Woodward from ICL.

Rewriting the plastics lifecycle

The review is blunt about what needs to happen next. Eliminating non-essential single-use plastics – which still make up roughly a third of production – and capping virgin plastic output would cut the problem at its source.

The authors also call for international standards that make products genuinely reusable and recyclable, rather than nominally “recyclable” in ways that rarely work outside the lab.

“A circular plastics economy is ideal. It must go beyond reduce, reuse, and recycle to include redesign, rethink, refuse, eliminate, innovate, and circulate – shifting away from the current linear take-make-waste model,” said co-author Julia Fussell from ICL.

That shift isn’t only about materials. The paper argues for integrating plastics and climate policy and for coordinating research so scientists can track how warming, chemistry, and biology interact in real ecosystems.

Those interactions on land may be even more complex than at sea and will require targeted monitoring to untangle.

Cutting plastic pollution at the source

Microplastics are not going away. Even perfect policies can’t rewind decades of production. But today’s choices will determine tomorrow’s impacts, as well as whether vulnerable species and systems have room to adapt.

“The future will not be free of plastic, but we can try to limit further microplastic pollution. We need to act now, as the plastic discarded today threatens future global-scale disruption to ecosystems,” Wright said.

“Solutions require systemic change: cutting plastic at source, coordinated global policy such as the UN Global Plastics Treaty, and responsible, evidence-based innovation in materials and waste management,” Kelly concluded.

The study is published in the journal Frontiers in Science.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–