Researchers and healthcare workers have seen a rapid rise in reports of the alpha-gal food allergy, which is linked to bites by certain ticks. The number of confirmed cases jumped from just 24 in 2009 to more than 34,000 in 2019.
“Red meat allergy caused by tick bites might be increasing in association with fragmented habitats,” noted Dr. Brandon D. Hollingsworth, from UNC Health, who was lead lead author of a new study in the mid-Atlantic region.
Dr. Hollingsworth has explored how environmental features might be tied to these tick-borne reactions.
Alpha-gal syndrome (AGS) affects people who have developed a specific immune response triggered by substances present in tick saliva. After being bitten, they react negatively to certain sugars in mammalian meat, and develop symptoms that include hives, stomach distress, and sometimes serious reactions.
Health specialists have noted that neurotoxins and other biological cues in tick saliva may help these creatures to latch onto humans, increasing exposure for people in areas where wildlife and urban zones overlap.
Those who live near forest edges, or in suburban spots with scattered trees, may be at higher risk.
Fragmented lands often bring deer, raccoons, and other tick-carrying animals into contact with human communities. Large lawns that border wooded patches create a patchwork of grass and trees, which many ticks seem to favor.
Recent investigations found that open space development and low-intensity construction might be associated with more tick bites.
Arachnologist field surveys have shown that some of the densest populations of the tick Amblyomma americanum occur where small forests and developed lots meet.
Scientists who mapped the distribution of alpha-gal syndrome in North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia observed a general shift in case frequency from coastal plains to mountainous zones.
Some analyses showed patchy spots in coastal lands, but the highest likelihood of cases was often in places with low-density sprawl.
Low-density suburban settings offer enough shade, leaf litter, and wild animal life to allow ticks to flourish. Even properties with scattered white-tailed deer traffic may give these ticks the chance to drop off and find new hosts.
Diagnosing alpha-gal syndrome isn’t easy. Unlike most food allergies, symptoms don’t appear right after eating. They can take 3 to 6 hours to show up, which makes it hard for people to connect their symptoms to something they ate.
Even worse, most doctors still aren’t familiar with the condition. A 2023 CDC report found that 77% of U.S. healthcare providers were either unaware of AGS or unsure how to diagnose it.
Without proper testing and awareness, thousands of people may go undiagnosed or misdiagnosed, often enduring months of unexplained symptoms.
Reports of alpha-gal syndrome could keep rising if habitat changes continue and warmer temperatures extend the active season for ticks. Simple habits, such as using insect repellents, wearing light-colored clothing, and promptly checking for ticks after yard work can reduce exposure risks.
Healthcare professionals also suggest that individuals track any reactions linked to beef, pork, or other red meats.
Test positivity rates in certain regions have approached 30% of screened patients, which means vigilance is important for anyone experiencing odd, food-related issues.
“We found evidence that suggests repeated tick bites can set off the allergic response,” wrote Gary Crispell, who studied tick-induced IgE patterns in North American patients. Surprisingly, a single tick bite is sometimes enough to spark alpha-gal sensitivity in certain people.
Although this condition can affect day-to-day life for some, awareness among doctors and patients is still catching up.
Early and correct diagnosis can help steer people away from foods that might trigger severe meat allergy events, leading to more confident meal choices and fewer unwelcome surprises after sitting at the dinner table.
One of the main limitations in current research is that tick exposure is estimated based on where a person lives, not on the location where they were actually bitten. Many people spend time in parks, on trails, or visiting family in different areas, so the models can’t pinpoint exact exposure sites.
Researchers also noted that wealthier individuals in suburban areas might be more likely to seek medical help and testing, which could also skew case data.
To improve accuracy, future studies may need to incorporate patient travel histories and broader seroprevalence surveys across different income and age groups.
Many counties across the mid-Atlantic are adding public health alerts to help folks recognize the signs of alpha-gal syndrome.
Researchers have expressed hope that timely recognition of these habitat factors will lead to targeted education, so that fewer individuals end up with frustrating or even dangerous allergic reactions.
Some people worry that fewer forest corridors might mean fewer ticks, but partial deforestation and selective development sometimes backfire by providing more edges for tick proliferation.
Land planners aiming to reduce tick-human contact may need to balance green space with better pest-management practices.
The study was published in the journal PLOS Climate.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–