Astronomers capture first image of a star that exploded twice

A star died in a way that astronomers had long suspected but never seen so clearly. Its remains show two separate layers of debris, the calling card of a double explosion.

The object sits in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a nearby dwarf galaxy about 160,000 light years away. Its relic shell, named SNR 0509-67.5, still glows centuries after the blasts.

In a peer reviewed paper, the team reports two distinct shells rich in calcium, with a single shell of sulfur nestled between them.

The pattern matches what models predict when a white dwarf undergoes two linked detonations. One starts in an outer helium layer, and the other fires in the star’s carbon oxygen core.

The calcium sits in two concentric layers because each detonation forged calcium in a different part of the star. The sulfur peaks between those layers, where conditions favored its production.

Understanding type Ia supernovae

A Type Ia supernova, a powerful stellar explosion that briefly outshines an entire galaxy, happens when a white dwarf in a binary system ignites in a thermonuclear runaway. The blast unbinds the star and floods space with heavy elements.

These events shine with a predictable brightness after calibration, so they act as distance markers across the cosmos. Using them revealed the accelerating expansion of the universe.

Because Type Ia supernovae anchor our cosmic yardstick, their trigger mechanism matters. If there are multiple ways to ignite them, astronomers must account for that diversity.

This study of SNR 0509 adds direct, visual evidence that at least some Type Ia explosions happen before the white dwarf reaches a critical limit. That pushes theory toward more than one path to detonation.

How SNR 0509 exploded twice

In the double detonation scenario, a thin helium blanket builds up on the white dwarf’s surface. The helium becomes unstable and detonates first.

That surface blast sends a shockwave racing around the star and inward. The shock compresses the core and triggers a second, deeper detonation.

The result is a single supernova event with a two stage trigger. The calcium fingerprint of SNR 0509, two shells with sulfur in between, preserves the sequence in the expanding debris.

The team explained that white dwarf explosions are central to astronomy because they help trace the universe’s expansion and chemical makeup, but the precise mechanism that triggers these blasts has remained a mystery for decades.

Calibrations and calcium maps

If some Type Ia supernovae explode below the Chandrasekhar mass, the maximum mass a white dwarf can reach before collapsing under its own gravity, their brightness and colors can differ in subtle ways. Calibrations must capture those differences to keep distance estimates tight.

The calcium map from SNR 0509-67.5 acts like a forensic photograph. It shows the white dwarf blew in two stages, not by slow mass growth to a single critical threshold.

This helps explain why Type Ia supernovae are not perfectly uniform. It also guides models that convert explosion physics into light curves and spectra.

That feedback loop, observation to model and back, improves how we use these events to measure cosmic distances. It also clarifies how much nickel, iron, and other elements each path makes.

Inside the SNR 0509 remnant

The remnant is a near perfect sphere because it is expanding into low density gas. Shock waves have peeled back the outer layers and exposed deeper ejecta structures.

As the inward moving reverse shock ionizes the debris, highly ionized calcium glows at two radii. Sulfur peaks between them, matching hydrodynamic simulations of a double detonation.

The SNR 0509 shell spans about 23 light years and is expanding at more than 11 million miles per hour. 

Because the remnant is only a few centuries old, its interior stratification is still readable. The two calcium shells have not mixed away, preserving the explosion’s imprint.

Chemistry written in light

Calcium traces different burning regimes in the star. The helium layer produces calcium at lower densities, while the core detonation forges calcium deeper in.

Sulfur highlights the intermediate density zone between those calcium layers. Its placement is a key check against models that predict a single sulfur shell.

Seeing both at once removes ambiguity that can linger in spectra alone. Spatial maps settle debates that light curves and one dimensional models could not resolve.

The researchers emphasized that the findings show white dwarfs can explode before reaching the Chandrasekhar mass limit, providing firm evidence that the double-detonation mechanism occurs in nature.

What the data say

The small Doppler shift difference between the two calcium shells shows they are separate layers, not a projection of one shell. That supports a two stage formation history.

Computer models that simulate how stars explode under fluid dynamics show the same structure seen in the remnant.

When the models use a white dwarf lighter than the Chandrasekhar mass, they produce two calcium shells with a sulfur layer between them, just like the observations.

This match suggests the models are capturing the real physical process behind the double explosion.

This agreement does not prove every detail, but it secures the basic trigger sequence. The remnant’s tomography makes the case in plain view.

Lessons from SNR 0509

Type Ia supernovae still come from multiple channels, including different kinds of companion stars. A double detonation explains a significant fraction, but likely not all.

Future observations will look for the same calcium sulfur pattern in other young remnants. A larger sample will test how common this path is and how it affects brightness diversity.

Better three dimensional radiative transfer models will connect ejecta maps to observed colors. That will sharpen the standardization that underpins distance measurements.

As methods converge, the cosmic distance ladder gains strength. That keeps the focus on physics, not just fits to data.

The study is published in Nature Astronomy.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–