Most modern dogs carry hidden wolf DNA - even chihuahuas

New research suggests that most modern dogs carry a small but detectable dose of wolf DNA acquired after domestication. Moreover, this lingering wolf ancestry has nudged traits from body size and olfaction to behavioral tendencies. 

Led by the American Museum of Natural History and the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History, the study argues that this post-domestication gene flow likely gave dogs extra adaptive tools for thriving in wildly different human-made environments. 

“Modern dogs, especially pet dogs, can seem so removed from wolves, which are often demonized,” said study lead author Audrey Lin.

“But there are some characteristics that may have come from wolves that we greatly value in dogs today and that we choose to keep in their lineage. This is a study about dogs, but in a lot of ways, it’s telling us about wolves.”

Dogs can tolerate wolf DNA

For years, the prevailing view held that true dogs could not tolerate much wolf DNA without blurring species lines. The new analysis flips that assumption. 

The researchers mined more than 2,700 published genomes from wolves, breed dogs, village dogs, and other canids – from the late Pleistocene to the present.

They found that almost two thirds of breed dogs retain traces of wolf ancestry in their nuclear genomes. 

This stems most likely from crossbreeding roughly 1,000 generations ago. Every village dog genome analyzed also carried detectable wolf DNA.

“Prior to this study, the leading science seemed to suggest that in order for a dog to be a dog, there can’t be very much wolf DNA present, if any,” Lin said.

“But we found if you look very closely in modern dog genomes, wolf is there. This suggests that dog genomes can ‘tolerate’ wolf DNA up to an unknown level and still remain the dogs we know and love.”

Most dogs are like wolves

Purpose-bred wolfdog lines had the highest wolf fractions. Czechoslovakian and Saarloos wolfdogs carried between 23% and 40% wolf ancestry. 

Among conventional breeds, standouts included the Great Anglo-French tricolor hound at about 4.7–5.7% and the Shiloh shepherd at roughly 2.7%.

The Tamaskan, created to look wolf-like using northern breeds, clocked in around 3.7%. Intriguingly, wolf ancestry isn’t confined to big, hard-charging dogs: even the chihuahua shows about 0.2%.

“This completely makes sense to anyone who owns a chihuahua,” Lin said. “And what we’ve found is that this is the norm – most dogs are a little bit wolfy.”

Patterns across functions and sizes

When the researchers sorted breeds by their form and function, clear patterns emerged.

Larger dogs tended to carry more wolf ancestry, as did breeds shaped for harsh environments or tough jobs – from Arctic sled dogs to landrace “pariah” breeds and many traditional hunting dogs.

By contrast, terriers, gundogs, and scent hounds tended to sit on the lower end of wolf ancestry.

There were exceptions on both sides: some large guardian breeds showed no detectable wolf DNA, while a few small or companion breeds retained modest traces.

Behavior of dogs with wolf DNA

To probe behavior, the team compared how kennel clubs describe breeds with relatively high vs. low wolf ancestry. 

Breeds at the low end were more often labeled “friendly,” followed by “eager to please,” “easy to train,” “courageous,” “lively,” and “affectionate.”

Breeds with higher wolf ancestry were more commonly tagged “suspicious of strangers,” as well as “independent,” “dignified,” “alert,” “loyal,” “reserved,” and “territorial.” 

Other terms, such as “intelligent,” “obedient,” “good with children,” “dedicated,” “calm,” “cheerful,” were found across both groups. The authors stress these are culturally biased descriptors, not hardwired genetic readouts, but the associations open new avenues for behavioral genetics.

Wolf genes as an adaptive toolkit

The most compelling evidence that post-domestication wolf DNA has mattered comes from specific gene regions.

In village dogs, segments of wolf ancestry were enriched at olfactory receptor genes, which seems reasonable for free-roaming dogs that scavenge human waste and need a sharp nose to survive. 

In high-altitude guardians like the Tibetan mastiff, the team spotlighted a Tibetan wolf-like variant linked to low-oxygen tolerance on the Tibetan Plateau and Himalayas.

These examples suggest that occasional gene flow from wolves didn’t “undo” dogs. Instead, it offered useful solutions to life alongside people in extreme places.

“Dogs are our buddies, but apparently wolves have been a big part of shaping them into the companions we know and love today,” said study senior author Logan Kistler. 

“Through the years, dogs have had to solve all kinds of evolutionary problems that come with living with humans, whether it’s surviving at high altitude, searching for their next meal as they freely roam a village, or protecting the herd, and it seems like they use wolf genes as part of a toolkit to continue their evolutionary success story.”

Beyond the origin myth

Dogs diverged from an extinct gray wolf population roughly 20,000 years ago under human influence, and sustained hybridization with wild wolves appears rare in recorded history. 

But this study shows that rare doesn’t mean irrelevant: small pulses of gene flow have left a durable imprint across lineages as different as Shiloh shepherds and chihuahuas.

That imprint doesn’t make modern companions any less of a dog. It may be part of what made them so good at being dogs in the first place.

The study is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–