Satellites detect a strange phenomenon occurring in forests around the world

Forests are the planet’s lungs, drawing carbon from the air and exhaling life back into it. Yet for decades, these vital ecosystems have been shrinking at alarming rates, replaced by farmland, cities, and empty clearings.

As climate anxiety rises, many have turned to tree-planting drives and billion-seedling pledges to restore Earth’s green cover. But what if nature itself already holds the most powerful solution?

A new study published in Nature suggests exactly that. Researchers found that up to 530 million acres of deforested tropical land – an area larger than Mexico – could regrow naturally if simply left alone.

This natural resurgence could absorb 23.4 gigatons of carbon over 30 years, drastically aiding global efforts to fight climate change.

Beyond carbon, it could also restore biodiversity, improve water quality, and stabilize local climates.

Natural regrowth of forests

“Tree planting in degraded landscapes can be costly. By leveraging natural regeneration techniques, nations can meet their restoration goals cost-effectively,” said Brooke Williams of the Queensland University of Technology and the Institute for Capacity Exchange in Environmental Decisions.

“Our model can guide where these savings can best be taken advantage of,” she adds.

The study identifies five countries that hold more than half of this regeneration potential – Brazil, Indonesia, China, Mexico, and Colombia.

These nations, rich in tropical landscapes, now stand at the frontier of a quiet, natural recovery.

Their ecological conditions, including strong soil carbon content and proximity to surviving forests, make them ideal grounds for large-scale regrowth.

Tracking forest regrowth from space

This global effort is the culmination of decades of remote-sensing and ecological research. Matthew Fagan, an environmental systems expert at the University of Maryland, helped develop the critical dataset used in the study.

“We used satellite images to identify millions of small areas where tree cover increased over time,” Fagan said. “We then excluded the areas planted by humans with machine learning, focusing on natural regrowth.”

The research tracked tree cover changes from 2000 to 2012 and verified if those forests persisted through 2015. The result was a rich global dataset showing where nature has quietly been reclaiming ground.

Using these insights, the team built a predictive model capable of mapping regeneration potential at a resolution of just 98 feet (30 meters).

Each pixel on the digital map represents the probability of natural forest recovery – an extraordinary level of precision that helps local policymakers see opportunities at both national and community scales.

Cheaper than planting trees

Tree planting often dominates environmental policy, but it is not always the best or most efficient path. The study compares the costs of active reforestation with those of natural regeneration and finds a striking difference.

Regrowing forests naturally can cost as little as $5 per acre, while tree planting efforts can exceed $10,000 per acre for the same area.

The researchers note that naturally regrown forests often harbor greater biodiversity and remain stable for longer periods than those established through planting campaigns.

This approach doesn’t mean doing nothing – it means creating the right conditions for recovery. Assisted natural regeneration may involve removing invasive species, fencing out grazers, or preventing fires.

These small actions can speed up recovery while allowing natural seed dispersal and ecological succession to take the lead.

The study shows that the highest regrowth potential occurs within 300 meters of existing forests, where seeds and pollinators thrive in abundance.

Forest soil holds the secret

Soil organic carbon emerged as a powerful predictor of regrowth success. Areas rich in organic matter tend to nurture more resilient vegetation, while degraded soils often stall recovery.

“Those factors in particular seem to do a really good job explaining the patterns of regrowth we see across the world,” said Fagan.

Proximity to intact forests also matters because nearby trees supply a constant rain of seeds, fostering genetic diversity and aiding the establishment of complex plant communities.

On a planetary scale, if these 530 million acres were allowed to regenerate, they could collectively sequester up to 30 gigatons of carbon when belowground biomass is included.

That represents roughly a 14-percent increase in global carbon sequestration potential compared to what tropical forests currently achieve.

Local voices, lasting forests

While the study’s findings are global, its authors emphasize that implementation must remain local.

“Our goal and our hope is that this is used democratically by local people, organizations, and localities from the county level all the way up to the national level, to advocate for where restoration should happen,” said Fagan.

“The people who live there should be in charge of what happens there – where and how to restore really depends on local conditions.”

The resulting high-resolution map allows decision-makers to identify priority zones for regeneration, helping to integrate ecological goals with economic planning.

The map offers not just a tool for conservationists but also a potential blueprint for rural development, carbon credit programs, and water resource management.

Protecting the regrowth of forests

However, the study warns that many areas with strong regrowth potential face immediate threats. Newly regenerating forests can be lost again to agriculture, urban development, or fire.

The researchers recommend supporting local communities through financial incentives such as payments for ecosystem services or verified carbon credit schemes.

But they also highlight that current carbon market frameworks rarely account for naturally regenerating forests, limiting financial support for such efforts.

Strong local governance, public awareness, and policy reform are therefore essential to protect these young ecosystems.

Without long-term protection, the promise of natural regeneration may fade as quickly as it appears.

Nature’s blueprint for renewal

If even part of this potential is realized, it could mitigate nearly 27 percent of global carbon across deforested lands.

The benefits extend far beyond climate balance. Regrowing forests enhance water quality, stabilize soil, and revive habitats for countless species.

For communities living nearby, they restore natural resources, reduce erosion, and bring rainfall stability back to regions long parched.

“Our model can guide where these savings can best be taken advantage of,” added Williams.

Her words echo a deeper truth – that humanity’s best ally in restoring Earth’s balance may not be new technology or vast plantations but nature itself.

The study is published in the journal Nature.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–