Geologists doubt Earth has the amount of copper needed to develop the entire world

Every buzzing phone call, every late-night lamp glow, every mile an electric car glides down the highway has one thing in common: they’re all powered by copper.

The rosy metal hides in cables, motors, chargers, even inside the walls that keep the lights on. As more people are born and more households plug in, electricity use ratchets upward, and copper demand climbs right alongside it.

That rising appetite poses a dilemma. Global supplies can cover roughly a quarter-century of today’s needs, yet digging ore out of the ground, refining it, and moving it to market is anything but swift.

In a world racing to slash carbon pollution while also lifting billions into better living conditions, the speed limit on copper production suddenly matters.

Copper powers modern life

After the introduction of smartphones, wind turbines, and high-capacity batteries, copper’s role has grown from important to indispensable.

A recent study led by University of Michigan earth and environmental scientist Adam Simon, together with colleagues at Cornell University and the University of Queensland, takes a hard look at how much of the metal will be required over the next generation.

Their modeling shows that simply continuing “business as usual” population growth and rising standards of living would consume about 1,100 million metric tons of copper by 2050.

For context, global mines turned out roughly 23 million metric tons in 2024 – barely two percent of what the world will burn through over the next twenty-five years.

How much copper is enough

The number climbs higher when the researchers layer green-energy targets on top of everyday growth. Transitioning every passenger vehicle on the planet to electric power using copper-based materials, along with the necessary grid upgrades, pushes demand to 1,248 million metric tons.

Relying mostly on wind and solar power bumps the requirement to 2,304 million metric tons. Building a grid that stores energy in large-scale battery packs sends the tally soaring to 3 billion metric tons.

Meanwhile, emerging economies have their own copper bills to pay. India alone will need about 227 million metric tons to expand power lines, hospitals, and sanitation systems.

The forty-plus nations of Africa could require around 1 billion metric tons to build comparable infrastructure.

Development vs. decarbonization

Simon emphasized that the growing global need for copper, and the amount required to power the transition of all nations to clean energy, is creating a fundamental tension.

As he sees it, the demand driven by basic economic development – what he calls “global human development” – should take precedence over aggressive electrification goals.

He put the tradeoff in stark terms: if it comes down to expanding healthcare access in Africa or increasing the number of electric vehicles on the road, the choice should be clear – prioritize healthcare.

He also pointed to a striking disparity in copper use between wealthy and developing nations.

Over the course of the 20th century, the United States progressed from having no electricity or plumbing to becoming a copper-intensive society, with more than 400 pounds of copper per person embedded in homes and infrastructure.

In contrast, Simon estimates that in countries like India, the figure is closer to just 40 pounds per person.

Copper, mining, and clean power

Meeting even baseline demand will not be easy. The study calculates that sixty-plus large mines, each yielding 500,000 metric tons a year, must come online before 2050 just to keep economic growth on track.

Financing that many projects hinges on price. According to the team, copper would have to trade above $20,000 per metric ton – more than double 2024 levels – to nudge investors toward green-lighting new pits.

Copper use is not carved in stone. Hybrid cars, which pair small batteries with gasoline engines, need far less of the metal than fully electric vehicles.

Power grids that mix nuclear, wind, solar, and a pinch of natural-gas backup can slice the copper bill dramatically compared with battery-heavy systems.

“First of all, users can fact-check the study, but also they can change the study parameters and evaluate how much copper is required if we have an electric grid that is 20% nuclear, 40% methane, 20% wind, and 20% hydroelectric, for example,” Simon said. “They can make those changes and see what the copper demand will be.”

Role of recycling

Reprocessing old wiring and plumbing will help, but only up to a point. The study notes that recycling has been growing at about 0.53 percent a year.

If that pace holds through 2050, secondary copper will supply roughly 13.5 million metric tons – just over a third of what “business as usual” growth alone would swallow in a single year.

Where do we go from here?

The numbers paint a clear picture: electrify everything too quickly, and copper bottlenecks threaten both climate goals and the push to bring reliable power, clean water, and health care to those who still lack them.

Pace the transition, boost recycling, diversify energy sources, and open new mines, and the world may thread the needle. Either way, the humble red metal remains at the center of tomorrow’s power play.

The full study was published in the journal SEG Discovery.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–