Bigfoot meets modern science: Why the search may never end

Science often moves forward because people chase questions that refuse to fade. Bigfoot sits in that strange corner where curiosity pushes against the limits of accepted knowledge.

A new study shows how the search for Bigfoot now depends on discipline, careful work, and modern tools.

The relentless search for Bigfoot

Dr. Jamie Lewis of Cardiff University spoke with more than 150 Bigfoot investigators. He found that people want their work to look grounded and structured.

Many spoke about long nights outdoors and long hours checking every small trace.

Each person enters the forest with a different approach. Some study sound patterns. Others watch for unusual marks on trees. Some focus on soil impressions that vanish quickly. Each clue matters, even when unclear.

Dr. Lewis explained the commitment behind this search. “As a sociologist of science, I’m really interested in the ways that ordinary people create knowledge, using scientific rhetoric and technologies in attempts to prove their theories,” he said.

His interviews revealed different strategies, including drones in the sky, thermal cameras scanning dark ridges, and parabolic dishes catching distant calls.

People follow faint tracks, record strange noises, and check disturbed ground. The effort repeats week after week.

What the witnesses describe

Bigfoot reports appear across North America. The Pacific Northwest holds the highest number of claims.

Witnesses describe a tall ape-like figure with long arms, coarse hair, and oversized feet. Supporters point to photos, videos, footprints, and odd sounds. Surveys show growing belief across the continent.

“Skeptics might believe that Bigfooters are rejecting science by chasing an animal whose existence has never been proved. But what my interviews showed were the ways in which Bigfooters draw on their idea of scientific practices to piece together fragments of what they believe is tangible evidence,” said Dr. Lewis.

Some point to unusual ground patterns. Others highlight odd calls in the night. Many compare their findings with known animals to rule out common explanations.

Beliefs about Bigfoot

Most Bigfoot investigators believe the creature is biological. A smaller group imagines something supernatural.

Researchers call the majority group “the Apers.” Their claims could align with mainstream science if strong evidence appears.

Dr. Lewis began exploring this topic during lockdown. Extra time at home led him to many Bigfoot programs.

Curiosity grew, and Dr. Lewis reached out to investigators. Many shared long stories, personal routines, and their own surprises from the field.

His work appears in Bigfooters and Scientific Inquiry: On the borderlands of legitimate science, written with Dr. Andrew Bartlett.

When Bigfooting is taken seriously

“For this work, we adopted a stance that we jokingly call, ‘methodological credulity,’ but the point behind that is serious,” said Dr. Bartlett.

“If we are to understand how people outside of the institutions of science attempt to collect evidence and make knowledge claims – and this applies much more widely than just to Bigfooting – we are not going to get very far if we dismiss their efforts a priori.”

Dr. Bartlett believes public debates about evidence often miss the importance of shared expertise.

“In taking the time and care to understand their knowledge world and their rationality, we can see just how much their activities are not ‘anti-science’ but an attempt to be scientific as they see it.”

Many people now feel pressure to judge information alone. Bigfoot communities show another path, where people compare ideas and challenge one another.

Deeper meaning in the mystery

“Bigfoot exists. Not necessarily as a biological creature, but certainly as an object around which thousands of Americans organize their lives, collecting and analyzing evidence, and making knowledge,” said Dr. Lewis.

That idea shapes weekend plans, friendships, and long-term hobbies. People return to forests, compare findings, and refine their interpretations.

For some, the search matters as much as the conclusion. The work builds meaning, sharpens skills, and keeps the mystery alive.

This study shows why Bigfoot remains powerful in imagination and practice. The search involves discipline, long patience, and steady observation. It also reflects deep curiosity rather than rejection of science.

The search continues

The forests may never reveal a final answer. Still, the pursuit continues to grow. Curiosity keeps people moving through the trees, watching the shadows, and hoping the next footprint will settle the question.

Many investigators describe a feeling that rises each time they enter remote ground. The quiet invites attention. Every sound triggers a new thought.

A cracked branch may mean nothing, yet the moment pushes the search forward. People check the ground, scan the horizon, and listen with care.

Some return to the same valley each year. Others choose new regions with fresh hope. The routine builds a sense of purpose.

Bigfoot remains a symbol of the unknown. The figure invites questions, challenges assumptions, and encourages close attention to overlooked details.

The search continues because many people enjoy that challenge. The process brings meaning, structure, and excitement to ordinary days.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–