New chemical process breaks down 90% of plastic in just 30 minutes
07-10-2025

New chemical process breaks down 90% of plastic in just 30 minutes

A Styrofoam (polystyrene plastic) take‑out food box can outlive its owner and their children. It weathers rain, sunlight, and curbside crushes yet still hangs around, splintering into smaller shards instead of disappearing.

An Australian research team now reports a way to erase 90% of that throw‑away plastic in just thirty minutes, using nothing more exotic than air, purple light, and a pinch of table-grade chemicals.

Dr. Maxime Michelas of the University of New South Wales School of Chemical Engineering (UNSW), working with colleagues in the School of Chemistry and CSIRO, describes the method in a recent study.

Their approach slices stubborn polymers into bite‑size molecules that industry already uses to make solvents, coatings, and flavors.

Polystyrene plastic linger for centuries

Humanity produces more than four hundred million tons of plastic per year, and the figure keeps climbing even where recycling programs thrive. Most items are designed for single use, yet their bonds resist microbial attack and sunshine alike.

Polystyrene poses a special headache. The foamed version is restricted in several U.S. states, yet analysts expect global demand to reach sixty‑two million tons within a decade.

Its light weight means flakes travel far on the wind, then fracture into microplastics that slip through standard filters and into drinking water.

Medical journals now link those particles to oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in animal and cell models. Surgeons have even found plastic fragments embedded in arterial plaque removed from heart patients.

Turning sunlight into a scalpel

Michelas’ team turns the low‑cost salt iron trichloride into an aggressive photocatalyst.

When a 405‑nanometer LED excites the salt, it spawns chlorine radicals that yank hydrogen atoms off the polymer backbone.

The orphaned carbon grabs oxygen from the air, the chain snaps, and the plastic’s mass plunges.

The setup looks almost rudimentary. A glass flask sits on a stir plate, air or pure oxygen bubbles through a dichloromethane solution of shredded plastic and five mole percent catalyst, and a small LED panel shines from the side.

Dissolving plastic by 90%

Under those conditions the authors report a 90% mass loss for seven commodity polymers in half an hour.

Extending exposure to three hours pushes conversion to 97%, a milestone that once demanded day‑long lamp times.

For the fastest substrates, including poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(methyl acrylate), most bond‑breaking happens in the first ten minutes.

Even polyvinyl chloride, notorious for its tight packing and limited solubility, gave up seventy‑eight percent in the half‑hour window.

“I think it’s very important to degrade the polymer and turn it into another feedstock we can use for other things, or just to reduce the amount of microplastics in the world,” noted Dr. Michelas.

From trash to toolkit chemicals

Breaking chains is only half the story. Gas‑chromatography traces reveal a soup rich in small aldehydes and carboxylic acids that can feed into paint, adhesive, or fragrance manufacture with little additional purification.

Because the catalyst is iron and the reaction runs near room temperature, the energy bill looks minimal compared with pyrolysis or incineration.

The group demonstrated a fifty‑gram‑per‑liter run that held over eighty‑five percent efficiency, then regained speed simply by bubbling in fresh oxygen when the gas was spent.

Checking the energy math

A 2023 case study of a decentralized pyrolysis unit showed that processing 360 tons of mixed plastic per year demanded about 560 MWh of electricity, or roughly 1,550 kWh for every ton treated.

That figure dwarfs the LED‑lit UNSW setup, which relies mainly on ambient heat and the modest power draw of a few lamps.

While the pyrolysis plant did recover energy by burning the oil it made, the upfront input highlights why lower‑temperature chemistry matters.

Slashing kilowatt‑hours per ton means smaller carbon footprints and lower operating bills, especially in regions where electricity still comes from coal.

For context, running a fifteen‑watt LED strip for half an hour consumes about 0.015 kWh, orders of magnitude below even the leanest pyrolysis benchmarks.

Multiply that by thousands of lamps in parallel, and the energy tab still lands far south of thermochemical routes.

Savings for cities and companies

Foamed polystyrene can occupy up to thirty percent of landfill volume by space, prompting bans in California, Maine, and Maryland that steer eateries toward plant‑based or recyclable packaging.

Yet many municipalities still receive tons of foam, paying transport costs on material that weighs almost nothing but swallows cubic yards.

A low‑temperature, bench‑scale unit could let waste haulers liquefy that foam onsite, drain the product into drums, and sell it to chemical distributors. Haulers would cut diesel miles, and cities would shrink the footprint of their transfer stations.

Less polystyrene plastic, better health

Environmental researchers estimate the average person ingests about five grams of dispersed plastic per week, roughly the weight of a credit card.

By tackling items most prone to shedding, like takeaway containers, the UNSW chemistry could noticeably dent that intake.

Though the catalyst cannot vacuum particles already loose in rivers, less fragmentation upstream means fewer specks small enough to cross gut or lung barriers.

Lower exposure could reduce inflammatory burdens now documented in lab studies, easing a growing public‑health worry.

Saving Earth from polystyrene plastics

No exotic materials are required, so startups could prototype light‑reactor tubes that rely on midday sun instead of LEDs in sunny regions.

Developers might even graft the concept onto existing plastic‑sorting lines, dropping shredded waste into solvent loops rather than balers.

Regulators drafting extended‑producer‑responsibility rules can nudge investment by counting photochemical conversion toward plastic‑recovery targets.

Clarity on permitting would address solvent handling and air emissions, two hurdles that often stall new recycling infrastructure.

Further lab work will probe whether iron salts push hydrogen‑atom transfer in cross‑linked elastomers or complex multilayer films. Each additional success widens the path to a circular economy that values the carbon already in circulation.

Funding agencies often favor technologies that link waste reduction to high‑value outputs, and solvent‑phase depolymerization fits that brief.

Venture groups in Australia and Singapore have already begun scouting pilot‑scale demonstrations, according to the authors.

The study is published in Macromolecular Rapid Communications.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–

News coming your way
The biggest news about our planet delivered to you each day
Subscribe