Article image

Markets punish corporations that ignore climate and environmental risks

In a world grappling with the escalating impacts of climate change, corporations find themselves at a critical juncture. A new study has shed light on the financial implications of climate risks for businesses, revealing a stark divide between those that proactively manage these risks and those that pretend not to notice the looming threats.

The research, conducted by Qing Li, Clinical Assistant Professor at the University of Florida Warrington College of Business, and Yuehua Tang, Emerson-Merrill Lynch Associate Professor, analyzed earnings call transcripts from nearly 5,000 U.S. public companies.

Through innovative textual analysis techniques, the researchers developed measures of firms’ exposure to physical climate risks, such as hurricanes and wildfires, as well as the ‘transition risks’ associated with the global shift to a low-carbon economy.

Investors punish corporations that take climate risks

The study’s findings paint a compelling picture of the market’s response to climate risks. Companies facing high transition risks, such as those stemming from emissions regulations, tend to be valued at a discount by investors.

As Qing Li explains, “In recent years, overall investor attention to climate change has increased. As our research shows, companies that have high exposure to transition risk seem to be punished by markets.”

This valuation discount, however, does not apply to companies actively working to adapt their business models and mitigate climate impacts.

These proactive firms demonstrate a commitment to sustainable innovation and maintain their research spending even as transition risks intensify.

Proactive vs. passive strategies

The study highlights a stark contrast between the strategies and outcomes of proactive and nonproactive firms.

“The divide in strategies and outcomes between proactive and nonproactive firms is quite stark,” Yuehua Tang notes.

“Companies being transparent about their climate vulnerabilities but also demonstrating tangible responses to mitigate those risks seem to be rewarded by markets,” he said.

While proactive companies invest in sustainable solutions and green technologies, their passive counterparts often resort to slashing R&D budgets and jobs when faced with higher climate exposure.

This short-sighted approach could potentially undermine their long-term competitiveness in a rapidly changing business landscape.

Investors demand corporations disclose climate risks

The findings of this study come at a time when investors, regulators, and activists are increasingly pressuring companies to publicly disclose their climate risks.

In 2024, the SEC implemented new rules requiring public corporations to report risks from climate change impacts and, in some cases, their greenhouse gas emissions.

This push for transparency underscores the growing importance of climate risk assessment in informed investment decisions.

As investors become more attuned to the potential financial implications of climate change, companies that fail to address these risks may find themselves at a disadvantage in attracting capital.

Adapting to climate risks can boost valuations

While adapting to both physical and transitional climate risks comes with costs for businesses, the study suggests that proactive efforts could actually boost valuations and preparedness.

By demonstrating a commitment to sustainable practices and actively mitigating climate risks, companies can position themselves favorably in the eyes of investors who increasingly prioritize climate considerations.

As the world navigates the challenges posed by climate change, corporations must recognize the true cost of ignoring these risks.

By embracing transparency, innovation, and proactive strategies, companies can not only protect their bottom line but also contribute to a more sustainable and resilient future for all.

More about corporations and climate change

As the world grapples with the urgent need to address climate change, corporations find themselves at the forefront of this critical battle.

As discussed above, corporate responsibility extends beyond mere compliance with regulations. It requires a proactive approach to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, adopting sustainable practices, and driving innovation in clean technologies.

Reducing carbon footprint is a corporate imperative

Corporations must take decisive action to reduce their carbon footprint. This involves conducting thorough assessments of their operations, identifying areas of high emissions, and implementing strategies to mitigate them.

Companies should invest in energy-efficient technologies, optimize their supply chains, and transition to renewable energy sources.

By setting ambitious emissions reduction targets and regularly reporting on progress, corporations demonstrate their commitment to a low-carbon future.

Embracing sustainable practices

Sustainability is no longer a mere buzzword. It’s now a strategic imperative. Corporations that embrace sustainable practices not only contribute to the fight against climate change but also gain a competitive edge.

By integrating sustainability into their core operations, companies can reduce costs, improve resource efficiency, and enhance their brand reputation.

Sustainable practices also resonate with environmentally conscious consumers, who increasingly prioritize eco-friendly products and services.

Power of corporate research and development

Corporations possess immense potential to drive innovation in clean technologies. By investing in research and development, companies can develop groundbreaking solutions to mitigate climate change.

From renewable energy storage to carbon capture and sequestration, corporate-led innovations can accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy.

Collaborations between corporations, academia, and governments can further amplify the impact of these innovative efforts.

Engaging stakeholders for a collaborative approach

Effective corporate responsibility requires engaging with a wide range of stakeholders. Companies should actively collaborate with policymakers, NGOs, and local communities to develop comprehensive climate change strategies.

By fostering open dialogue and transparency, corporations can build trust and ensure that their actions align with the needs and expectations of society.

Engaging employees in sustainability initiatives can also foster a culture of environmental stewardship within the organization.

Leading by example causes a ripple effect

Corporations have the power to lead by example and inspire change across industries. When prominent companies take bold steps to address climate change, they set a precedent for others to follow.

By sharing best practices, advocating for progressive policies, and collaborating with industry peers, corporations can create a ripple effect that accelerates the global response to climate change.

In summary, corporate responsibility is a vital component in the fight against climate change. By reducing their carbon footprint, embracing sustainable practices, driving innovation, engaging stakeholders, and leading by example, corporations can play a pivotal role in shaping a sustainable future.

As the stakes continue to rise, it is imperative that corporations step up and take decisive action to address the climate crisis head-on.

The full study was published in the journal Review of Financial Studies.


Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and


News coming your way
The biggest news about our planet delivered to you each day