Missions to Mars: Which astronauts could handle the stress?

Mars calls to us like no other world. Yet behind that dream hides a brutal truth – space changes people. Months in a capsule, years without privacy, and the constant hum of machines can break even the strongest mind.

Before we send humans on a three-year mission to Mars, we must understand how people think, cope, and connect in isolation.

Teamwork matters in Mars missions

Living in space is not just about surviving the vacuum outside. It’s about surviving each other. Astronauts share everything – air, food, and emotional space. Small frictions can grow fast when escape is impossible.

One bad argument or one withdrawn crewmate can ripple through the team, hurting morale and focus. NASA and other agencies now realize that personality chemistry may decide whether a mission succeeds or collapses.

A digital Mars crew

To explore this, Iser Pena and Hao Chen from the Stevens Institute of Technology built a virtual Mars mission. Their study, published in PLOS One, used computer simulations to see how different kinds of people handle stress together.

They turned psychology into code. Each virtual astronaut came with a personality, a job, and a set of reactions. Together, these digital crewmates spent 500 simulated days in isolation.

“For the first time, we’ve combined psychological insights with a computer simulation to model a 500-day mission to Mars,” said the authors.

Personality in action

The simulation focused on five personality traits – openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.

Each trait affected how a crew member worked, relaxed, and responded under pressure. Some were steady and organized. Others were social and optimistic. A few struggled with anxiety and tension.

When stress built up, the mix of traits decided whether the team broke apart or pulled together.

Crews that blended conscientiousness with emotional stability handled pressure best. Those with social and agreeable members kept communication flowing and defused tension before it grew toxic.

Diverse teams in Mars missions

Uniform teams, where everyone thought and reacted the same, performed worse. When diversity increased, resilience improved. Emotional variety acted like a safety system.

A calm crew member could balance another’s frustration. A talkative one could lift silence during tense days. This mix of coping styles helped maintain focus, health, and performance across long stretches of confinement.

Stress patterns over time

At first, stress spiked. Isolation hit hard. But as the mission went on, some crews adapted faster than others. Teams rich in emotional balance found rhythm.

They shared burdens, built trust, and slowly steadied the group’s mood. Teams that lacked diversity stayed edgy longer and struggled to recover after conflicts.

The simulation also revealed a feedback loop. High stress lowered performance, which created more stress. When one member faltered, the whole system wobbled. Balanced teams, however, absorbed those shocks and stabilized faster.

Lessons for real missions

These insights could change how space agencies pick future crews. Technical skill alone is not enough.

A successful mission may depend on how personalities complement one another. Pena and Chen suggest matching astronaut roles to their psychological strengths.

A focused, organized person might handle navigation or systems checks. Someone with empathy and humor might keep morale high when tension rises.

“This new approach lets us explore how different astronaut personalities and team roles might affect a crew’s stress and performance, and it gives us a glimpse of the human challenges astronauts could face on these long journeys into deep space,” the authors added.

Beyond the code

Of course, no simulation captures everything. The model assumed that personalities stay fixed, but real people grow and adapt. Over months or years, bonds deepen, tempers soften, and new habits form.

Still, this study points in the right direction. It shows that science can predict – not just fuel and oxygen needs – but emotional stability and teamwork, too.

Human core of exploration

Future missions will rely on more than rockets and robots. The success of a Mars journey may rest on something deeply human: our ability to coexist under pressure.

Machines can keep astronauts alive, but only trust and adaptability will keep them sane. Reaching Mars will test not just engines, but empathy.

The study is published in the journal PLOS One.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–