Our brains are wired to learn computer code

Learning to program taps into neural machinery you already use for logic. Brain scans show that after a beginner course, reading code lights up those problem solving regions. 

Even before any training, the same areas respond when people read the same programs described in plain English. The takeaway is simple: most of us have the built-in capacity to learn to code.

In a recent study published in the Journal of Neuroscience, experts tracked college students with fMRI before and after a semester-long Python class. 

Led by researchers at Johns Hopkins University and supported by federal funding, the work maps where meaning from code lives in the brain and how quickly novices recruit those circuits.

The brain’s logic network

“Many of the things we do in the modern world, our brains didn’t evolve to do, including programming, driving, reading and math,” said senior author Marina Bedny, a cognitive neuroscientist who studies brain plasticity and development. 

“A programming class ‘recycles’ your logic brain areas for code. What we found is that by the time you get to college your brain already has the neural foundations for programming.”

After instruction, students reading snippets of Python showed patterns in fronto-parietal regions that carried the meaning of the algorithms, not just their visual form. 

In other words, clusters of neurons weren’t simply reacting to curly braces or keywords. They were representing what the code did – loops, conditionals, and data operations – as coherent concepts.

Code meaning is wired in the brain

Before the course, none of the participants could read Python. Yet when researchers presented the same algorithms as concise English descriptions, the very neural populations that later encoded code semantics already fired. 

That early activity suggests the brain’s logical reasoning system is primed to adopt code as a new “dialect” once the syntax barrier drops.

“Learning to code uses the same neural machinery that we use for logical problem-solving. Everyone has these abilities,” said Liu, who investigates how the brain learns educationally relevant cultural skills.

Brains can code – they just need syntax

The researchers used functional MRI to capture activity while undergraduates read short programs and matched them to outputs. They repeated the scans after students completed an introductory Python course. 

Multivariate analyses then asked whether patterns in the fronto-parietal network distinguished between different algorithmic meanings. Post-course, they did. Pre-course, they did too – but only when the tasks were phrased in natural language.

That dissociation – no code comprehension at first, clear logic representations in English – helps explain why coding often “clicks” after a short period of study.

Once students learn the grammar, the brain can map it onto a reasoning system it already trusts.

Widespread and trainable abilities

If programming piggybacks on general reasoning, not on speech-specific circuitry, curriculum design can lean into logic from day one. 

Tracing code to everyday problems, puzzles, and step-by-step planning may be more than motivational; it may be neurologically aligned with how novices learn. 

It also helps explain why people from varied backgrounds pick up coding later in life. They are not growing a brand-new mental organ. They are reusing one they’ve honed through games, math, debate, and daily decision-making.

AI assistants are lowering the barrier to entry. But even with smart tools, someone has to reason about problem structure, edge cases, and correctness. This study suggests those abilities are widespread and trainable.

What families and schools can do now

The findings point to simple ways to prime future coders. Logic games at the kitchen table, strategy board games, and step-by-step planning for real-world tasks can all exercise the system that code will later recruit. 

That practice doesn’t require a computer or specialized software; it requires habits of mind – if-then thinking, pattern spotting, and debugging plans when they fail.

“Someone not familiar with coding might look at Python and feel like they’d never be able to understand it, but our study suggests all of us have the capacity to code,” Bedny said. “We might even be born with it.”

A note of caution – and a big opportunity

The study followed students over a single semester and focused on short, tightly defined programs. Real-world software adds layers: collaboration, architecture, testing, and long-term memory for libraries and tools. 

Future work can explore how those skills recruit additional networks for language, memory, and social cognition. Even so, the rapid shift seen here – weeks, not years – shows just how plastic the adult brain remains for culturally recent skills.

Programming doesn’t demand an exotic “coder’s brain.” It asks an ordinary human brain to repurpose its logic network for a new notation. 

Teach the notation, and meaning flows to the right place. That’s an encouraging message for anyone eyeing their first “Hello, world” and wondering if they have what it takes.

Image Credit: Yun-Fei Liu/Johns Hopkins University

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–