Article image

Understanding procrastination: Negativity and task delay

Procrastination, often seen as a universal tendency to postpone tasks, gains a new perspective through recent studies conducted by psychologists at The Ohio State University.

These studies delve into the concept of “valence weighting bias,” a psychological term that explains how individuals make decisions based on their internal positive or negative attitudes. Specifically, this bias influences whether people approach or delay tasks perceived as unpleasant.

The dynamics of procrastination

Russell Fazio, a professor of psychology and senior author of the study, along with Javier Granados Samayoa, a former graduate student at the university, embarked on research to understand the dynamics between negativity, positivity, and task delay.

The findings suggest that individuals with a tendency to focus on negative aspects are more likely to procrastinate. However, there’s a silver lining: the research indicates it’s possible to recalibrate this negative bias towards a more neutral outlook, thereby reducing procrastination.

Valence weighting bias and procrastination

The researchers conducted three studies to explore the relationship between valence weighting bias and procrastination. The first study assessed participants’ habits concerning filing federal tax returns, a universally daunting task. They found that individuals with a stronger negative weighting bias were more likely to delay filing their taxes.

Granados Samayoa explained: “Our findings indicate that individuals who generally adopt a more negative outlook tend to postpone tasks unnecessarily.”

Self-control and motivation

The tendency to procrastinate was further examined in a second study involving 147 college students. This study not only looked at valence weighting bias but also considered the students’ self-control and motivation.

The results revealed that students with a negative bias and lower motivation or emotional energy for self-control were more inclined to delay participating in research programs, essential for accumulating course credits.

A balanced perspective

The third study aimed to establish a causal link between valence weighting bias and task completion. By manipulating the valence weighting bias among a group of self-identified procrastinators, the researchers observed a notable shift.

Students exposed to a balanced perspective of positive and negative signals engaged in tasks more promptly compared to a control group stuck in their negative biases.

Realistic self-assessment

Interestingly, the research also highlights that a negative weighting bias isn’t solely detrimental. It can foster a more realistic self-assessment in situations like evaluating one’s preparedness for an exam.

“A balanced approach, rather than swaying to extremes, tends to be more beneficial. However, the impact of a specific bias varies by context,” said Fazio.

Supported by the John Templeton Foundation and the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, this study not only sheds light on the mechanics of procrastination but also offers hope for those struggling with it.

By understanding and adjusting our valence weighting biases, we might find ourselves not only facing tasks more promptly but also approaching them with a more balanced and realistic mindset.

The full study is published in the journal Personality and Individual Differences.


Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and


News coming your way
The biggest news about our planet delivered to you each day