On February 13, 2023, a tiny asteroid named 2023 CX1 was spotted about seven hours before it hit Earth’s atmosphere. It ripped across the sky over northern France, producing a bright fireball, dropping meteorites that were later collected.
Rather than crumble as it fell, this asteroid held together, then blew apart all at once at a very low altitude.
That single, explosive breakup hints at a tougher kind of asteroid. And it nudges planetary defense planners to think differently about what a “safe” small impact might look like.
Only a handful of incoming meteors have been tracked ahead of time, and just two have yielded fragments later found on the ground – the second fell in Germany in 2024.
By combing through camera footage, Auriane Egal at the University of Western Ontario in Canada and her colleagues noticed that this one did something unusual.
Asteroids are rocky bodies that orbit the Sun, most of them clustered in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. They can range from just a few meters wide to hundreds of kilometers across.
A meteoroid, on the other hand, is much smaller – basically a fragment broken off from an asteroid or sometimes a comet. You can think of meteoroids as the little cousins of asteroids, traveling through space until they encounter Earth’s atmosphere.
When a meteoroid enters our atmosphere and burns up because of the intense heat from friction with the air, we call the streak of light a meteor, or more casually, a “shooting star.”
If part of that same meteoroid survives the fiery trip and lands on Earth’s surface, it becomes a meteorite.
So, the differences come down to size and location: asteroids orbit in space, meteoroids are smaller chunks moving through space, meteors are the bright trails you see as those chunks burn in the atmosphere, and meteorites are the pieces that actually make it to the ground.
Most meteoroids start shedding pieces as soon as air begins to crush and heat them as they enter Earth’s atmosphere.
2023 CX1 didn’t. It stayed largely intact until it plunged to about 17 miles (28 kilometers) in altitude, then exploded in a single, catastrophic event
The team estimates an energy release of about 0.029 kilotons – roughly 29 tons of TNT – with about 98 percent of its 1,433-pound (650-kilogram) mass lost in a fraction of a second.
“It was similar to a bomb,” said Egal, adding that it was a “single blow that generated one spherical shockwave, not multiple detonations all along its trajectory”.
This object was only about 28 inches (72 centimeters) across – beach-ball sized – and caused no damage on the ground. But the breakup style matters.
If a larger asteroid behaved the same way, releasing its energy in one tight burst rather than bleeding it out higher up, the shock could be much stronger at the surface. That’s why the team is flagging the risk.
Only one previous event looks comparable: the Novo Mesto meteor over Slovenia in 2020, which lost about 80 percent of its mass in a single explosion.
“This kind of fragmentation is more dangerous,” Egal said. “If you have a larger asteroid, its effects are going to be amplified. Maybe we need to evacuate a larger area near the predicted impact location,” if the asteroid were large enough that such action were necessary.
Knowing in advance whether an incoming body is likely to pop in one big detonation or crumble gradually could change who needs to move and how far they should go.
The rock’s toughness may trace back to its source. Samples recovered from the fall point to a common meteorite type known as an L chondrite, which makes up about one-third of the meteorites that land on Earth.
Egal’s team suggests the object may have come from a battered parent in the inner asteroid belt – possibly Massalia – where past collisions could have “toughened” the material.
“We have multiple shock veins in the meteorite that are witnesses [to] lots of impacts,” she said.
“Maybe this network of veins glued the rock together, and that’s why it holds better than other typical meteorites.” If so, prior damage didn’t weaken the stone. It stitched it up.
That possibility is what unnerves other researchers. L chondrites are everywhere in collection cabinets and fall statistics.
If a subset of them is more likely to hold together and then fail catastrophically, the risk profile changes.
“It’s a very common meteorite type, so this is the biggest worry,” he said. “These L chondrites could cause more damage than expected.”
The warning is simple: a familiar class might sometimes act in unfamiliar, higher-consequence ways.
Pre-impact tracking of asteroids is improving, but it remains rare for small bodies. 2023 CX1 offered a clean experiment: track it in space, watch it fall, collect its pieces, and link flight behavior to rock type.
The pattern that emerges is not the standard textbook one.
A single-burst detonation means a localized, stronger shockwave, not a string of smaller bangs spread over dozens of miles. For emergency managers, that difference matters.
Why did 2023 CX1 resist breakup until 17 miles? Was it composition, internal structure, entry angle, or some mix of all three?
One datapoint is not a rule. Novo Mesto makes two.
The next step is to catch more events from sky to ground and build a clearer picture of which rocks fail how, and where, in the atmosphere.
Until then, conservatism makes sense. If an incoming object looks tough, plans should assume a tighter, more powerful blast zone.
A small asteroid over France behaved like a single, low-altitude airburst. It looked, in Egal’s words, like a bomb. That kind of one-shot breakup concentrates energy and could raise risks for larger objects.
Early tracking, better material clues, and nimble response plans will help. For now, the lesson is straightforward.
Even a humble, beach-ball-sized stone can teach us how different space rocks break – and how we should prepare when a bigger one is on the way.
The study is published in the journal Nature Astronomy.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–