Scientific proof that auras exist? Examining the "phantom leaf effect"

In recent years, Kirlian photography has drawn considerable attention for its dramatic images that seem to show the “aura” of people and plants.

Many enthusiasts claim these vibrant outlines capture the life force or aura of plants, animals, and people.

Much of this fascination began with photos that appeared to show glowing silhouettes around organic objects. These images sparked debates about hidden energies and unseen spiritual qualities.

“No, Kirlian photographs do not show the soul of an organism,” said Christopher S. Baird, associate professor of physics at West Texas A&M University.

Baird has scrutinized Kirlian photography’s claims with a scientific lens. 

Kirlian auras and electricity

Kirlian photography involves sending high-frequency electricity through an object, which is often placed on a photographic plate. The energized air around the object glows, forming the bright outlines that some have called “auras.”

This process relies on a well-known effect called corona discharge, where electrified air molecules emit light as they gain and lose electrons.

Neon signs and fluorescent bulbs work in a similar way, although they typically rely on specific gases at lower pressures.

Researchers often highlight that living leaves and metal objects can produce comparable glows under similar conditions.

That fact challenges any claim that the glow comes from an invisible soul, since even coins and nails can generate the same luminous borders.

Why parts of leaves show an aura

Some experiments drew attention to a curious event called the phantom leaf effect, where part of a leaf is removed but still shows up in a Kirlian image. This was perplexing to observers back in the day.

“It is clearly a real phenomenon in need of explanation,” observed William A. Tiller of Stanford University in 1976. Reputable voices within academia called for investigation. 

“A normally undetected phantom ‘structure,’ possibly evidence of the biological field, can persist in the area of an amputated leaf section,” wrote John Hubacher in 2015, resurfacing the topic for the scientific world.

Moisture and ions

Some argued that residual moisture and ions on the glass cause these partial outlines. Others point out that local humidity or temperature changes can set off new electrical pathways that trace the leaf’s original shape.

Kirlian photography pioneers Semyon D. Kirlian and his wife Valentina K. Kirlian found that non-electrical features of a subject can sometimes be converted into electrical signals under high-frequency currents.

This transformation may give leaf remnants or moisture traces a chance to appear as hazy extensions in the final photograph.

Electrical experts say the discharge can get influenced by minuscule variations in conductivity. If a leaf’s torn edge retains fluid, those molecules might continue conducting electricity in the missing region, at least for a short time.

Searching for proof

Researchers who study these images confirm that small adjustments in voltage, humidity, or temperature can alter the glow. Shapes and brightness hinge on physical factors, not on an unseen essence.

Investigations with coins and nails that produce similar glows underline the purely electrical roots of Kirlian images. The photos do not differentiate between living and non-living materials when it comes to bright outlines.

Some have tried connecting these outlines to ideas about qi or other energy fields, but repeated tests show that the effects vanish if the conditions change.

That leads scientists to emphasize that the glow is not tied to any emotional or mystical energy.

Questions still remain

Even though many see Kirlian photography auras as a sign of hidden forces, critics remain cautious. Researchers note that rigorous protocols are crucial because contamination or leftover ions can create misleading outlines.

“The phantom leaf effect seen in Kirlian photography may help researchers better understand near-death and out-of-body experience,” wrote James Pace and Debora Drumm in 1992.

Some investigators still find the phantom leaf effect intriguing because it has been linked to questions about near-death or out-of-body experiences. 

New tests suggest the aura is physical

Discussions continue on whether something more than raw physics might cause these faint outlines. A few researchers have speculated about morphogenetic field concepts as proposed by Rupert Sheldrake, though that remains controversial.

Many modern studies lean toward purely physical explanations, such as conduction pathways formed by torn leaf sap or subtle air ionization.

The complexity of the effect suggests that even the smallest variables, like how fast the leaf was cut or how the glass was cleaned, can influence results.

Scientists who test phantom leaves often repeat the experiment under different settings to confirm that consistent outcomes are not guaranteed.

Some get the faint outline, while others see nothing, hinting that it might be a fleeting alignment of conditions rather than proof of a life force.

Kirlian auras linked to electricity

Kirlian photography creates striking visuals by using high voltage and electrified air.

Although some believe these colorful borders reveal hidden energies, most evidence points to well-known electrical discharges that rely on moisture, conductivity, and the environment.

In cut-leaf images, the missing segment sometimes lights up because of leftover liquids or temporary conduction bridges. Yet this effect does not happen every time, highlighting the unpredictable nature of electrical microcurrents.

Critics have repeatedly shown that coins and other non-living items produce a similar glow, which means there is no special link to an organism’s vitality.

If a so-called aura depended on a living essence, inanimate objects would not create the same effect.

Kirlian photography, nature, and auras

Researchers across physics, biology, and alternative medicine still test new hypotheses about Kirlian photography. Many focus on how voltage pulses, moisture, and gases shape these images, rather than invoking a spirit or soul.

Evidence to date favors the idea that these glowing outlines arise from physical forces. The sparks, arcs, and discharges are fascinating, but they do not confirm the presence of a spiritual aura.

Kirlian photographs show us how easily human perception can mistake natural effects for supernatural ones. They remind us why careful science still matters when beauty and mystery collide.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–