Quantum entanglement can now be recycled for networks

Quantum scientists have long treated quantum entanglement as precious cargo, forging fresh links for every secure message or computation. A new theoretical study proposes a thriftier route, letting an existing pair pass portions of its entanglement down an extended chain.

Experts from the Harish-Chandra Research Institute (HRI) report that the hand-off could continue, in principle, without end, though each recipient would receive a smaller slice of the original connection.

Why quantum entanglement matters

Entanglement links the properties of two or more particles so tightly that measuring one instantly tells you the state of the other, regardless of separation. This non-local bond underpins quantum key distribution, distributed sensing, and proposals for a global quantum internet.

Because the link cannot be copied, every application has relied on fresh pairs produced on demand, often with delicate lasers or cryogenic circuits. Generating and storing those pairs remains an experimental bottleneck.

A strategy that lets devices recycle an existing pair would trim that overhead and simplify network design. It could also cut the number of fragile qubit memories required at future repeater stations.

Networks built from recycled links could therefore run longer without waiting for central stations to reset and re-synchronize. That endurance matters for satellites or remote sensors that see only brief contact windows with the ground.

One quantum link for many network users

The team models two theoretical participants (quantum systems) in the mathematical model they called Alice and Bob, who start with one entangled pair.

Two newcomers, who they called Charu and Debu, each hold a separate particle that can interact locally with Alice and Bob but not with each other.

After one withdrawal, Alice and Bob still retain a reduced connection. That leftover can be used to fund the next pair in line without requiring any fresh entanglement.

Math behind quantum network sharing

The authors prove that the protocol can be iterated indefinitely, as long as each new customer is satisfied with a smaller balance. Their proof relies on a measure called concurrence, which tracks how much two-particle entanglement survives each step.

Charu and Debu receive an amount that depends only on the local operation chosen at their step, not on the growing crowd waiting behind them. That independence lets the chain grow as long as the math permits.

The authors also derive an upper bound on the entanglement each newcomer can hope to gain, ensuring the protocol respects the monogamy rules that forbid one qubit from sharing full strength links with multiple partners. 

The calculations confirmed that no party can cheat the system by claiming more than its share.The algebra, however, kept refusing to impose a hard cutoff.

Real-world devices limit repeated sharing

Real hardware will impose limits long before the math does. Each interaction leaks photons, picks up phase noise, or generates detector errors that sap usable correlations.

Engineers must therefore weigh the cumulative losses against the cost of preparing fresh pairs. A hybrid architecture might recycle links only once or twice before moving on.

Numerical simulations with realistic loss and detector models suggest usefulness may fade after a dozen rounds at telecom wavelengths. Superconducting circuits, with higher gate fidelities, could squeeze a few more iterations before noise dominates.

Testing quantum networks in labs

The protocol needs just local interactions and classical coordination, tools already common in superconducting and photonic labs.

A tabletop demonstration could couple two microwave qubits to a shared resonator and then transfer part of their entanglement to two fresh qubits downstream.

Optical groups could pursue a version with time-bin entangled photons stored in fiber loops. Each loop could spin a photon back through a beam splitter network that hands off correlations to a new path without touching the partner loop.

Researchers will need a clear metric for “useful” entanglement in realistic settings. Measures linked to secret-key rate or teleportation fidelity would offer concrete benchmarks.

Cross-platform trials, in which a superconducting node hands off entanglement to a spin qubit or trapped ion, could test compatibility between disparate hardware families. Such demonstrations would mirror the heterogeneous nature of future metropolitan networks.

Future of quantum networks

The new model also raises new theoretical questions. How many independent customers can extract a fixed minimum entanglement from a single source before the well runs dry?

Future research could combine the sharing approach with entanglement distillation, replenishing the degraded entanglement after multiple uses.

Scientists might also investigate whether multipartite connections – like Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states – behave differently under repeated sharing.

Policymakers investing in quantum infrastructure will likely pay close attention to these findings. Greater utilization could mean quicker returns on costly hardware deployments.

The study is published in the journal Physical Review A.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–