On August 12, 2025, researchers studying weaver ants announced a finding many have long wished to see in teamwork: individual effort increasing as the group grows.
The effect showed up in simple pulling tasks that mimic how these ants build their leaf nests.
The finding runs against the usual story in human teams, where added hands often mean less effort per person.
Here, the average contribution per ant climbed with team size, and the group pulled more efficiently than a stack of single workers could deliver.
“Each individual ant almost doubled their pulling force as team size increased – they actually got better at working together as the group got bigger,” said study lead author Madelyne Stewardson of Macquarie University.
To test this, the researchers coaxed colonies to form living chains and tug an artificial leaf connected to a force meter, letting them measure output from teams of different lengths.
The result pushes back on the Ringelmann effect, a well known drop in individual effort as group size grows. This effect was first discussed in rope-pulling studies and formalized in social psychology in 1979.
Decades of work have shown that social loafing happens across many tasks and settings.
A large meta-analysis later confirmed this pattern across 78 studies, noting strong roles for evaluation, expectations, and meaning in whether people keep trying hard in groups.
The authors describe a force ratchet inside the ant chain, a division of labor where front ants pull while others act as anchors that resist sliding and store elastic energy in the system. This arrangement converts short, local efforts into a larger, steadier team force.
Physical details help this work. Ant attachment pads and friction hairs can switch between stick and slip under shear, producing strong grip when pulled and easier release when pushed, a well documented feature of climbing pads in insects.
In weaver ants specifically, dense tarsal hair arrays and the soft pads called arolia generate friction and adhesion that scale with load and sliding, boosting traction in long chains that stay put while the front keeps hauling.
Engineers have aimed for the same mix of scalability and robustness in swarm robotics, where many simple robots coordinate through local rules rather than central control.
Swarms can be flexible, but coordination losses often blunt the gains you would expect from larger teams.
Recent reviews of collective transport highlight the challenge, showing how controller design and contact mechanics limit how well multi-robot groups combine forces on one object.
The ant strategy offers a practical blueprint: assign distinct roles that turn a delicate, shear-sensitive grip into stored force, then convert that force into movement with no wasted effort.
Weaver ants, Oecophylla smaragdina, are famous for aerial nests made by pulling leaves together and gluing edges with silk produced by larvae, a behavior documented across colonies that span several trees.
The species ranges across the Old World tropics, where large colonies build many leaf chambers and dominate tree canopies.
The force ratchet result adds a missing piece to that toolkit. Chains that both pull and lock down can stabilize leaf edges against recoil, then let other workers stitch the seam. That way, mechanics and behavior line up with the materials at hand and the job to be done.
Work on weaver ants has already shown that groups can coordinate direction without leaders during cooperative transport, relying on local cues and the forces that pass through the object being moved.
The new findings complement that picture by showing how teams scale force while maintaining control.
Together, these studies point to a consistent theme: simple rules at the individual level can yield precise, scalable performance at the group level when the physics of contact, friction, and elasticity are on your side. That alignment is what multi-robot teams often lack.
It will be interesting to see robots tested with ant-like roles, with some units pulling while others lock and store force through controlled shear against the ground or the payload.
The authors’ description of a force ratchet suggests algorithms that manage who anchors and who pulls, and when to hand off – all while exploiting shear-sensitive contact.
These concepts are ready for lab testing, pitting straightforward linear output against ant-style scaling in teams of legged or wheeled robots.
If successful, the method could benefit logistics, disaster response, and any situation where numerous small agents need to move something larger than any one of them.
The study is published in the journal Current Biology.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–