Article image

Behavioral changes were as effective as lockdowns during the pandemic

A major study led by the University of Oxford has found that Covid lockdowns were no more effective at controlling the pandemic than allowing people to adapt their behavior to the threat. 

“Despite the global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the question of whether mandated interventions have similar economic and public health effects as spontaneous behavioral change remains unresolved,” wrote the study authors. 

“Addressing this question, and understanding differential effects across socioeconomic groups, requires building quantitative and fine-grained mechanistic models.”

Key findings

The research, which modeled virus death and unemployment rates under different pandemic policies, indicated that while blanket shutdowns reduced fatality rates, a strategy similar to Sweden’s, where people adjusted their behavior voluntarily, was just as effective.

Behavioral changes 

“Both substantial behavioral changes and stringent closures lead to similar patterns of rising unemployment and fewer infections,” the authors reported. This conclusion was drawn despite the imposition of strict non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) such as lockdowns, social distancing, and face masks, which were deemed “critical” to reducing Covid spread. 

However, as the experts argued, “individuals changing their behavior of their own accord – such as by minimizing contacts and less frequent trips to shops or restaurants – could have also minimized deaths.”

Focus of the study 

The study, published in the journal Nature Human Behavior, utilized data from around 416,000 people in New York City, exploring various scenarios of restrictions and behavior changes. The findings revealed that both strict lockdowns and high rates of behavioral change led to a rise in unemployment and fewer Covid deaths. 

Critical insights 

The researchers found that if lockdowns were imposed, virus deaths fell 35 percent while unemployment jumped 64 percent. 

However, if people were left to their own devices in a ‘high fear’ situation, deaths decreased by 50 percent, while job losses increased by 40 percent.

Study significance 

Professor Doyne Farmer, director of the Complexity Economics program at Oxford’s Institute of New Economic Thinking, commented on the study’s relevance to ongoing global Covid inquiries. 

“We are seeing governments across the globe begin their ‘moments of reckoning,’ reviewing the effectiveness of a great variety of policies brought in during Covid,” said Professor Farmer.

“Our quantitative research helps provide evidence-based answers to these questions, suggesting that both lockdowns and spontaneous behavior change lead to similar trade-offs between health and the economy.”

Study implications 

The research also highlighted that applying restrictions late, when people have already adapted their behavior, leads to increased deaths and unemployment. 

“While it is intuitive to expect stricter mandated NPIs to increase unemployment and decrease Covid-19 deaths, it is less apparent that heightened behavioral adaptation would yield similar results.”

In conclusion, the study provides a critical perspective on the efficacy of different pandemic management strategies and their impacts on public health and the economy, underscoring the complexity of decision-making in unprecedented global health crises.

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.


Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and

News coming your way
The biggest news about our planet delivered to you each day