Shockingly small amounts of plastic are deadly for animals

Less than three sugar cubes worth of plastic can be enough to kill a seabird. Sea turtles and marine mammals reach similar danger at volumes scaled up to their larger bodies.

Those estimates come from a new analysis that pooled more than 10,000 animal autopsies to link plastic loads to the risk of death.

The results land in a world where roughly 12 million U.S. tons of plastic, an estimated 11 million metric tons, enter the ocean every year.

How small plastic kills animals

The work was led by Erin Murphy, a marine ecologist at Ocean Conservancy (OC) who specializes in how plastic harms wildlife.

Murphy’s research focuses on quantitative risk assessment (QRA), a way of using data to turn pollution exposure into clear estimates of risk for wildlife.

By combining the records, the team found that a surprisingly small number of large plastic pieces was enough to tip an animal.

Even when counts climbed into dozens of pieces, the volume inside the stomach stayed small compared with the size of the animal.

Impacts of plastic in the body

The injuries usually happen in the gastrointestinal tract, the long internal tube that moves food from mouth to stomach and out of the body.

Big items can block narrow bends, pierce delicate tissue, or twist sections of the gut so badly that blood flow and digestion stop.

The study focused on macroplastic balloons, bottles, and fishing gear. Because animals mistake these pieces for prey or swallow them along with food, a wrong item in the wrong place can be fatal.

What the autopsies revealed

For each carcass, the researchers carried out a necropsy, an internal exam of a dead animal that reveals injuries and foreign objects.

The team carefully opened the digestive system, counted every plastic piece, and noted where sharp edges, tangles, or blockages lined up with damaged tissue.

Across all the species, about one in five animals had plastic in the digestive system at the time of death.

The share was highest for sea turtles, followed by seabirds, and lowest for marine mammals, showing that exposure is far from evenly spread.

Consistent patterns of harm

The sample spanned 57 species of seabirds, all seven species of sea turtles, and 31 marine mammal species, from small porpoises to large whales.

That diversity made it possible to compare how different body shapes and feeding habits change the odds that a swallowed item will prove deadly.

Beyond this study, scientists have recorded plastic ingestion in nearly 1,300 marine species, including every family of seabirds and marine mammals and all sea turtles.

These consistent patterns of harm suggest plastic is a broad environmental stressor rather than a problem limited to a few unlucky species.

Animals at risk

The team saw that not all plastics are equally risky once they reach an animal’s gut. Patterns in the data showed that each animal group faced its own especially risky plastic types rather than one single worst offender for all.

For seabirds, just six pieces of rubber each smaller than a pea were enough to give roughly a 90 percent chance of death.

Hard fragments were slightly less deadly per piece but were also the most commonly eaten material, so even modest loads carried real danger.

For adult sea turtles, a few hundred small pieces of bag like plastic drove the modeled chance of death close to 90 percent. 

“One in 20 sea turtles that we studied died from ingesting plastics. I wouldn’t take those odds,” said Dr. Britta Baechler, who directs Ocean Conservancy’s ocean plastics research program and co-authored the study.

Among marine mammals, fishing lines, nets, and ropes were especially dangerous. In the model, swallowing fewer than thirty pieces of this kind of debris was enough to give even large whales a high risk of dying.

Plastic from seafood to meat

Large items like bags and bottles do not stay intact forever, because sunlight, waves, and scraping slowly grind them down.

Those fragments can shrink into microplastics, plastic pieces smaller than about a fifth of an inch that drift through water and into food webs.

One recent study measured microplastic contamination in 16 common protein products sold in the United States, from seafood to beef to plant-based meat alternatives.

Researchers found plastic fragments in every type of protein they tested, showing that our own diets now mirror the contamination seen in marine wildlife.

Plastic in the food chain

Another group examined seafood from the U.S. coast and found anthropogenic particles, tiny human made bits from plastics, in every fish and shrimp tested.

In that study, only two of 182 animals were free of these particles, which shows how far plastic pollution has spread through food chains.

Scientists are still working out what this means for human health, but the direction of travel is clear.

The same plastic that kills seabirds, turtles, and whales is also moving through the foods people eat and the waters people drink.

Reducing deadly plastic encounters

Nearly half of the animals that had eaten plastic belonged to species that conservation groups call “red listed,” with a high risk of extinction.

When deadly plastic encounters are hitting animals that are already struggling, each extra death pulls those populations closer to disappearing.

“We’ve long known that ocean creatures of all shapes and sizes are eating plastics,” said Murphy. She explained that the lethal dose changes with species and plastic type but is smaller than people expect, especially given constant plastic entering the sea.

“When you pick up just a few pieces of plastic, you are helping to protect the life of a marine animal,” said Allison Schutes, who directs cleanups for Ocean Conservancy.

According to Chelsea Rochman, an ecologist at the University of Toronto (UT), this research provides an important foundation for decision-makers to understand thresholds for risk.

Rochman and many others argue that setting clear limits on plastic production and waste is the next step if these findings are taken seriously.

The study is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–