What creates monster rogue waves? Scientists identify a pattern

On January 1, 1995, an approximately 84-foot wall of water struck the Draupner platform in the North Sea, leaving behind the first reliable open-ocean record of a rogue wave. That single event kicked off a scientific hunt to understand how such rare giants can arise without breaking any rules of physics.

Francesco Fedele, an associate professor in Georgia Tech’s School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (GT), led a new analysis that tackles this question head-on.

Scientists typically define a rogue wave as a crest whose height is greater than twice the significant wave height, the average of the highest one-third of nearby waves. They note that such waves can arrive from unusual directions and catch mariners off guard.

Tracking extreme waves at sea

The team assembled 27,500 half-hour wave records spanning 2003 through 2020 at the Ekofisk platform in the central North Sea. They then compared how often extreme crests occur under different sea states.

The experts found that the statistics of the largest crests match ordinary processes once you account for direction, frequency spread, and how steep the waves get as storms intensify.

For years, many researchers considered modulational instability, an effect that can amplify one wave at the expense of its neighbors in long, one directional wave trains, to be a leading explanation for rogue waves.

In the open ocean, however, waves distribute energy across multiple directions. Analysis of the North Sea records indicates that third-order resonant interactions have an insignificant role in the formation of large waves.

Angles shape rogue waves

Directional spreading plays a central role in how wave energy is distributed in the open ocean.

When waves travel in multiple directions, the chances of sustained energy transfer from one wave to another diminish. This limits the potential for a single wave to grow disproportionately large.

In contrast, when waves are confined or closely aligned, their concentrated energy along a narrow track allows modulational instability to play a greater role.

In the North Sea, measurements consistently show a diverse range of incoming wave angles, even during severe storms. This multidirectional environment disperses wave energy and disrupts the formation of conditions necessary for modulational instability to dominate.

As a result, other mechanisms – such as linear focusing and second order bound nonlinearities – emerge as the primary drivers behind the largest observed waves in these waters.

Two forces behind ocean giants

Two common, well-understood effects explain these ocean giants. The first is linear focusing, in which waves align in time and space, combining to create larger waves.

The second is second-order bound nonlinearities, which sharpen crests and flatten troughs. The authors estimate these can boost already tall waves by roughly 15 to 20 percent relative to linear predictions.

The Andrea rogue wave, recorded near Ekofisk in 2007, has served as a benchmark for testing extreme wave statistics and encounter probabilities in realistic seas.

That work showed how often such crests could be encountered by a fixed platform or a moving ship over a given area. It was a step toward turning folklore into engineering numbers.

Records refine rogue wave science

The North Sea dataset was large enough to separate young, wind-forced seas from older, more mature seas without mixing apples and oranges.

Young seas with strong winds displayed higher skewness and larger bound, not dynamic, kurtosis. This is exactly what you would expect if bound nonlinearities, not modulational instability, dominate under real storm conditions.

If rogue waves stem from rare alignments and bound effects, detection becomes a pattern recognition problem, not a physics search.

A 2024 study trained a neural network on buoy records and reported correct classification of roughly 75 percent of rogue events one minute ahead. Accuracy was about 70 percent five minutes ahead. The findings suggest that short-fuse warnings are feasible when instruments are in place.

Design, operations, and safety

Forecast offices already analyze wave and circulation models several times per day to anticipate wind waves and swell. Researchers are extending that toolkit toward extremes as data and methods improve.

The takeaway for ships and offshore structures is straightforward yet profound: be prepared for extremes driven by everyday physics.

In addition, place sensors and algorithms where they can spot the telltale setup before a crest peaks.

Myths about rogue waves

The folklore that rogue waves are rare beyond belief does not hold up to modern records and careful statistics.

Official guidance still reminds mariners that a single extreme crest can come from an unexpected direction. Events higher than about twice the local sea’s significant wave height fall into the rogue category, a sober framing that aligns with the North Sea analysis.

Bigger, cleaner datasets will help quantify how directional spread, current shear, and depth modulate the chance of constructive alignment without invoking special mechanisms.

Combining radar, buoy networks, and ship-based observations could sharpen short-term warnings. This data could also improve design criteria for platforms and long routes that cross energetic seas.

The study is published in the journal Scientific Reports.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–