Article image

Every increase in plastic production results in identical increase in plastic pollution

Recent research has revealed a startling connection between plastic production and pollution, with every 1% increase in plastic production leading to a corresponding 1% rise in plastic environmental pollution. The study, published in Science Advances, marks the first robust quantification of this global relationship.

Corporate culprits in plastic production

The investigation was conducted by an international team from the United States, Australia, the Philippines, New Zealand, Estonia, Chile, Sweden, Canada, and the United Kingdom.

The findings point to 56 global companies, mainly in the food, beverage, and tobacco sectors, as being responsible for more than half of all branded plastic pollution.

Notably, The Coca-Cola Company emerges as the top polluter, responsible for 11% of branded waste, followed by PepsiCo at 5%, and both Nestlé and Danone at 3%.

This significant and disturbing study utilized data from over 1,576 brand audits spanning 84 countries, gathered over five years by more than 200,000 volunteers through initiatives like Break Free From Plastic and 5 Gyres’ TrashBlitz app.

These brand audits involve volunteers conducting waste clean-ups and documenting the brands on the collected pollution, providing a ground-level view of the impact of plastic production.

Reducing plastic production

The pervasive nature of plastic pollution across diverse geographical locations and waste management systems indicates that a reduction in plastic production, especially within the fast-moving consumer goods sector, could dramatically lessen global plastic pollution.

As discussions unfold at the Global Plastics Treaty negotiations this month in Ottawa, Canada, this research could greatly influence the adoption of high-ambition, legally binding provisions focusing on corporate accountability and the promotion of sustainable practices like reuse and refill systems.

Scientific community explains the study’s significance

“When I first saw the relationship between production and pollution, I was shocked… But it gives me hope that reducing plastic production and shifting towards more durable and reusable products would have a strong positive impact on the environment,” stated Win Cowger, researcher at the The Moore Institute for Plastic Pollution Research.

“I urge world leaders at INC-4 to listen to the science, and to consider the clear link between plastic production and pollution during negotiations for a Global Plastics Treaty,” added Dr. Lisa Erdle of The 5 Gyres.

Sybil Bullock from Break Free From Plastic calls attention to the persistent shortcomings of major corporations in reducing their plastic impact, advocating for, “a legally binding Global Plastics Treaty that mandates significant cuts in plastic production and stops corporations from flooding the planet with single-use plastic.”

Dr. Jorge Emmanuel critiques the often-misguided blame placed on poorer countries for global plastic pollution. He reflects on the role of global companies since the 1960s in introducing single-use plastics that displaced traditional, sustainable practices.

Dr. Kathy Willis highlights the major role that single-use packaging plays in branded plastic pollution, stressing the importance of, “data [that] can help inform ways to address plastic production and reduce plastic waste ending up in the environment.”

Urgent need for systematic reform and policy change

The comprehensive results of this study distinctly illustrate the direct correlation between plastic production and environmental pollution, while emphasizing the pressing necessity for systemic reforms.

These changes are crucial not only for improving current conditions but also for ensuring long-term environmental sustainability.

Promoting corporate accountability and supporting sustainable methods can lead to substantial ecological advantages. By adopting responsible production practices and reducing plastic waste, companies can make a meaningful impact on global pollution levels.

Furthermore, as international discussions progress, the findings of this study are invaluable in pushing for effective and binding environmental policies.

This research equips policymakers and advocates with the evidence needed to implement stringent regulations that hold corporations accountable and foster a shift towards more sustainable industrial practices.

Strategies to reduce plastic production

Reducing plastic production involves a multifaceted approach that incorporates regulatory, corporate, and community actions. Here’s a detailed breakdown of each strategy:

Implement regulations

  • Ban single-use plastics: Some governments have started banning or restricting the use of single-use plastic items like straws, bags, and food containers.
  • Quotas and tariffs: Implementing quotas on the amount of plastic that can be produced and imposing tariffs on plastic imports can reduce the availability and affordability of plastics.

Promote sustainable alternatives

  • Research and development: Investing in the development of alternative materials such as plant-based bioplastics that degrade more quickly and have a lower environmental impact.
  • Support for alternatives: Providing subsidies or tax breaks for companies producing and using alternative, sustainable materials.

Enhance recycling programs

  • Improve recycling infrastructure: Upgrading facilities and technologies to handle a broader range of plastic products and improve the efficiency of recycling processes.
  • Standardize recycling practices: Creating uniform guidelines for recycling across regions to maximize participation and effectiveness.

Corporate responsibility

  • Product redesign: Companies can redesign products to use less plastic or replace plastic with other materials. For example, using glass or metal which are more easily recyclable and often more sustainable.
  • Extended producer responsibility: Implementing policies where manufacturers are responsible for the entire lifecycle of their products, including disposal and recycling.

Consumer awareness on plastic production

  • Educational Campaigns: Conducting campaigns to educate the public about the impacts of plastic pollution and how to reduce plastic use.
  • Promoting Reuse: Encouraging consumers to use reusable items, like shopping bags, water bottles, and containers.

Economic incentives

  • Grants and Loans: Offering financial support to start-ups and businesses that are developing plastic alternatives or improving recycling technologies.
  • Penalties for High Plastic Use: Imposing fines on companies that exceed a certain level of plastic use or waste, incentivizing them to find greener solutions.

By integrating these strategies, communities, nations, and businesses can significantly cut down on plastic production, leading to a cleaner and more sustainable environment.

Plastic, pollution, and the path towards sustainability

In summary, this important study has exposed the undeniable link between plastic production and pollution, pinpointing the fast-moving consumer goods sector as the key contributor to this global crisis.

As world leaders convene to negotiate a Global Plastics Treaty, this research serves as a crucial plea for decisive action. We must demand corporate accountability, prioritize plastic production reduction measures, and promote reuse and refill systems.

The path forward is clear: by holding corporations responsible for their role in the plastic pollution predicament and focusing on reducing production, we can work towards a cleaner, more sustainable future for our planet. The time for action is now.

The full study was published in the journal Science Advances


Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and


News coming your way
The biggest news about our planet delivered to you each day